Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Ki-84 "Frank"

  1. #1
    Homer Simpson's Avatar
    Homer Simpson is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    17
    Country: United States

    DefaultKi-84 "Frank"

    How did this Fighter plane perform against the Corsair, Hellcat and Mustang?
    I Know the Ki84 was a good fighter plane
    Thanks everyone!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Wyalong, NSW
    Posts
    5,850
    Country: Australia

    Default

    The best link I've found detailing some history:

    Hasegawa 1/32 Ki-84 'Hayate' by Tom Cleaver

    I don't think I've read about encounters with Franks. The last book I read that would have any chance of that was Silently into the Midst of Things by Atholl Sutherland-Brown, 177 Sqn's history - there was reference to fighter interceptions but can't remember what they were (but all of the action was over Burma not China where the Franks were reportedly based).

    It would be interesting to look into USAAF 14th AF reports as Franks reportedly flew rings around them. I guess they mean the P-38s and P-51s.
    Last edited by Antipodean Andy; 04-21-2008 at 08:49 PM.

  3. #3
    noraebong Guest
    Country: Canada

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Antipodean Andy View Post
    The best link I've found detailing some history:

    Hasegawa 1/32 Ki-84 'Hayate' by Tom Cleaver

    I don't think I've read about encounters with Franks. The last book I read that would have any chance of that was Silently into the Midst of Things by Atholl Sutherland-Brown, 177 Sqn's history - there was reference to fighter interceptions but can't remember what they were (but all of the action was over Burma not China where the Franks were reportedly based).

    It would be interesting to look into USAAF 14th AF reports as Franks reportedly flew rings around them. I guess they mean the P-38s and P-51s.

    A good book on the air war in the Pacific, with significant technical data on airplane types involved and some performance comparisons, is Eric Bergerud's Fire in the Sky. Lots of anecdotal stuff..quotes from pilots and aircrew involved. Great book. Great overall discussion of all aspects of war, including strategy, tactics, geography and its influences on the fighting,men, and machines. Kind of "holistic" view of the war. I have seen used copies online for very good prices.

  4. #4
    war hawk's Avatar
    war hawk is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania,USA
    Posts
    406
    Country: United States

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Homer Simpson View Post
    How did this Fighter plane perform against the Corsair, Hellcat and Mustang?
    I Know the Ki84 was a good fighter plane
    Thanks everyone!
    Yes the Frank was a good fighter, do you consider it as good as the Corsair , Mustang?. Most Franks had , 2 20 mm 2 7.7 mm machine guns, some had 4 20 mm cannons. Decent speed , good manuevarability. I just don"t think there as good as the Corsair, Mustang.

  5. #5
    war hawk's Avatar
    war hawk is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania,USA
    Posts
    406
    Country: United States

    Default

    actually ther is no way it matches the Mustang , Corsair

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Wyalong, NSW
    Posts
    5,850
    Country: Australia

    Default

    What makes you say that, WH? Loyalty or analysis? I hope the latter as I can't directly recall any encounters with Franks so I would love to hear of some.

    I always find it hard to compare aircraft although, obviously, some have distinct advantages over others. Many people have gone round and round about what's the best and what's the worst but, to me, there is never any definitive answer. For example, you can say quite easily that the Spitfire is a better aircraft than the Hurricane but, at the same time, you're comparing two aircraft built entirely differently. On top of that, the Hurri could absorb more punishment and was a more stable gun platform. Swings and roundabouts. The perrenial favourites for "worst" are always the Buffalo and the Airacobra but look at how the Finns used the former (and give kudos to the Commonwealth guys in the Far East as well) and how the Russians used the latter. We had a discussion on here a while ago regarding what makes a good pilot and this can be extended to the aircraft as well. No matter how inferior an aircraft like the Buffalo appeared to be, there was always a group of pilots who could make it work. In that sense, I reckon, without looking into it further, a Frank would be a worthy match for a Corsair or Mustang on even terms. Sure, it might be not as well built or whatever but I bet it could out-turn its opponents. In the latter stages of the war when the Mustang and Corsair were more prevalent in the Frank's "world", it's also quite likely the Japanese pilots were, for the most part, nowhere near as experienced or well-trained as their predecessors.

    There is some comment in the link above that it could also out-climb seriously powerful and/or lightweight aircraft like the P-47N and P-51H.

    Just my thoughts in a rare moment of clarity!
    Last edited by Antipodean Andy; 12-09-2008 at 10:30 PM.

  7. #7
    Nostalgair's Avatar
    Nostalgair is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    610
    Country: Australia

    Default

    Hi All,

    I found this on another forum,

    Ki84 vs P-51 Combats

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "I can think of two specific examples where Ki84 Type 4 fighters gained the advantage over P-51 Mustangs

    (1) October 4,1944. Four P51s of the 23rd FG where shot down with the loss of two pilots. The 85th Sentai with 4 Ki-44 and four KI-84s claimed five P-51s including two by Wakamatsu.

    (2) November 11.1944-Three P-51s of the 23rd FG were shot down in combat."


    Cheers

    Owen

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Wyalong, NSW
    Posts
    5,850
    Country: Australia

    Default

    The 23rd FG was the successor/evolution of the Flying Tigers and were equipped with Mustangs from late 1943 so certainly no shortage of experience and skill at the time.

  9. #9
    Kyt's Avatar
    Kyt
    Kyt is offline Άρης
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Terra something or other
    Posts
    7,226
    Country: United Kingdom

    Default

    As they always say, the aircraft is only as good as its pilot. It should also be remembered that the Mustang wasn't that widely used in the Pacific and so a direct comparison is difficult because it's use has to be analysed within the context of the ever decreasing quality of the Japanese pilots as the war progressed, as well as the fact that it was an extremely complicated machine and the standards of production were slipping daily.

  10. #10
    war hawk's Avatar
    war hawk is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania,USA
    Posts
    406
    Country: United States

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Antipodean Andy View Post
    What makes you say that, WH? Loyalty or analysis? I hope the latter as I can't directly recall any encounters with Franks so I would love to hear of some.

    I always find it hard to compare aircraft although, obviously, some have distinct advantages over others. Many people have gone round and round about what's the best and what's the worst but, to me, there is never any definitive answer. For example, you can say quite easily that the Spitfire is a better aircraft than the Hurricane but, at the same time, you're comparing two aircraft built entirely differently. On top of that, the Hurri could absorb more punishment and was a more stable gun platform. Swings and roundabouts. The perrenial favourites for "worst" are always the Buffalo and the Airacobra but look at how the Finns used the former (and give kudos to the Commonwealth guys in the Far East as well) and how the Russians used the latter. We had a discussion on here a while ago regarding what makes a good pilot and this can be extended to the aircraft as well. No matter how inferior an aircraft like the Buffalo appeared to be, there was always a group of pilots who could make it work. In that sense, I reckon, without looking into it further, a Frank would be a worthy match for a Corsair or Mustang on even terms. Sure, it might be not as well built or whatever but I bet it could out-turn its opponents. In the latter stages of the war when the Mustang and Corsair were more prevalent in the Frank's "world", it's also quite likely the Japanese pilots were, for the most part, nowhere near as experienced or well-trained as their predecessors.

    There is some comment in the link above that it could also out-climb seriously powerful and/or lightweight aircraft like the P-47N and P-51H.

    Just my thoughts in a rare moment of clarity!
    Yeah I guess so But the Corsair had good manueverability, because the wings are bent upward. Your right about the fact that the Frank could outclimb, Corsair, Mustang

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Group Captain Percy Charles "Pick" Pickard
    By liverpool annie in forum Biographies
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 02:30 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-23-2009, 04:21 PM
  3. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-03-2009, 06:36 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-22-2008, 08:11 PM
  5. South Korean cosmetics company "adjusts" Hitler reference in ad
    By Antipodean Andy in forum News Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-16-2008, 03:32 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •