Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: The Doolittle raid on Japan

  1. #11
    The Aviator is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    132
    Country: Australia

    Default

    Now we may get a bit of balance.

    Hmm. Pretty scarce birds over at the other place 'ol mate.

  2. #12
    Kyt's Avatar
    Kyt
    Kyt is offline Άρης
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Terra something or other
    Posts
    7,226
    Country: United Kingdom

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spidge View Post
    I let my daughter eat sushi for Christ's sake.
    That's nothing to do with the Japanese - that's just child cruelty. Raw fish! Yuk!

  3. #13
    The Aviator is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    132
    Country: Australia

    Default

    Yeah and a lot of seafood are eaten while it is still alive. Surprise.

  4. #14
    Adrian Roberts's Avatar
    Adrian Roberts is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Wickham, Kent
    Posts
    869
    Country: United Kingdom

    Default

    Ok, back to the serious stuff, another boring question from Adrian:

    The site is great on the men involved, but unless I haven't looked hard enough, I couldn't find much on the aircraft.

    What did they carry in the way of gun armament? I believe that normally a B25B carried a dorsal and ventral turret with twin fifties, and a 0.30 in the nose. I can see dorsal turret in the photos: were the ventral turrets retained or were they removed to save weight? One of the crew was designated an engineer/gunner so presumably there must have been some guns retained.

    Given that weight reduction was important, both for max range and to get off the flight deck, I'm a little surprised that they needed two pilots and a separate navigator and bombardier. Can any of you elaborate on why this was necessary?
    Last edited by Adrian Roberts; 11-19-2007 at 07:40 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Wyalong, NSW
    Posts
    5,850
    Country: Australia

    Default

    AR, I thought they were unarmed other than the black painted broomsticks in the tail! Looking at the pic posted by TA, it would appear the dorsal turret may have been the one with the broomsticks as there does not appear to be a tail position.

  6. #16
    The Aviator is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    132
    Country: Australia

    Default

    I had to look back to see what the question was about Adrian. I thought it was seafood.

    The aircraft were modified by:

    Removal of the lower gun turret
    Installation of de-icers and anti-icers
    Steel blast plates mounted on the fuselage around the upper turret
    Removal of the liaison radio set
    Installation of three additional fuel tanks and support mounts in the bomb bay, crawl way and lower turret area to increase fuel capacity from 646 to 1,141 U.S. gallons (2445 to 4319 litres)
    Mock gun barrels installed in the tail cone, and
    Replacement of their Norden bombsight with a makeshift aiming sight.
    Two bombers also had cameras mounted to record the results of bombing.


    On 1 April, the 16 modified bombers, their five-man crews and Army maintenance personnel were loaded onto the USS Hornet at Alameda. Each aircraft carried four specially-constructed 500-pound (225 kg) bombs. Three of these were high-explosive munitions, while the other was a bundle of incendiaries. The incendiaries were long tubes, wrapped together in order to be carried in the bomb bay, but designed to separate and scatter over a wide area after release. To decrease weight (and thus increase range), the bombers' armament was reduced. Each bomber launched with two .50-calibre (12.7 mm) machine guns in an upper turret and a .30-caliber (7.6 mm) machine gun in the nose. Two wooden, simulated gun barrels mounted in the tail cones were intended to discourage Japanese air attacks from that direction, and were cited afterward by Doolittle as being particularly effective.

    In the picture below, Navy Capt. Marc A. Mitscher, skipper of the USS Hornet chats with Lt. Col. James Doolittle and the boys before takeoff.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  7. #17
    Kyt's Avatar
    Kyt
    Kyt is offline Άρης
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Terra something or other
    Posts
    7,226
    Country: United Kingdom

    Default

    Another site on the raid:

    Doolittle

    Has a audio commentary by Doolittle

  8. #18
    war hawk's Avatar
    war hawk is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania,USA
    Posts
    406
    Country: United States

    Default

    That raid was awesome, it was totally revenge against the Japs. clapping:

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Medals stolen in raid
    By Kyt in forum News Articles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-27-2009, 12:19 PM
  2. Doolittle Raid Photos
    By Kyt in forum The Allied Forces
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-14-2008, 09:51 PM
  3. The Great L.A. Air Raid Mystery
    By Kyt in forum General Topics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-25-2008, 08:34 AM
  4. Air Raid siren question...
    By Geedee in forum The war in the air
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-23-2008, 02:31 PM
  5. The Taranto Raid
    By Kyt in forum The war at sea
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-14-2007, 05:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •