Quote:
Originally Posted by barnsey
Was I right about the pay being stopped in the early part of the war after their ship was sunk? Stan May wrote extensively ....I'll get the details off him again.
My very best regards |
Belated welcome Barnsey!
I have discussed this quite alot over the past few years and also with Hugh.
99.9% of people would be unaware of the despicable way these brave men were treated when their ships were sunk.
Hugh's quote of:
Quote:
|
Their pay was stopped before the ship hit the bottom
|
is spot on the money.
We had a Russian chap (visitor) on another forum who when told of the brave men who sailed to Murmansk with supplies for the Russian people, responded with:
Quote:
|
We didn't need your second hand supplies, we wanted a second front
|
Whilst bomber command was "recognized" for their efforts to a degree, I put them in a similar position to the MM's.
Who would want to do that trip across the Atlantic knowing that you could be blown out of the water at any minute.
The lads from bomber command climbed on board night after night knowing their chances of returning were very poor indeed.
With respect to the Merchant Navy/Marine, Hugh said it all - Too little, Too late.