Go Back   WW2 Forum > Welcome! > Latest News
Portal Forums Register Arcade Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Latest News News from ww2chat and the ww2network

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2008, 11:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
Wise1
Getting Wiser!
 
Wise1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 537
You're Top Poster: #6
Wise1 has disabled reputation
Just watched the episode, quite interesting, Not my particular area of interest however I never knew the allied bombing campaign went so wrong when it was supposed to deal such a blow to the Germans
__________________
Lee Wisener
Site Administrator
-----------------
Wise1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2008, 12:15 AM   #12 (permalink)
Adrian Roberts
Senior Member
 
Adrian Roberts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Wickham, Kent
Posts: 287
You're Top Poster: #9
Adrian Roberts is on a distinguished road
I've just watched the Timewatch programme, using Virginmedia's Catch-up On Demand facility for the first time.

A brief reaction: it seems that the planners knew that Omaha would incur heavy casualties because of its physical features - dominated by "bluffs" (cliffs) with pillboxes on top, including those at either end of the beach which enabled enfilading fire. So why was it so necessary to take out Omaha on the first day? If they wanted to land on five beaches, was there no alternative? Could not they have landed on the other four and surrounded Omaha from the rear later? The landing forces needed to advance inland, but it would only have taken a relatively small proportion of them to isolate the Omaha garrison from reinforcements, and either attack from the rear or just starve them into surrender.

And the lessons of WW1 had not been learned. The experience of July 1st 1916 should have taught them not to rely on heavy bombardments to take out a dug-in enemy - especially a sufficient time in advance to alert the occupants of an attack. And by 1918, both the almost successful German Kaiserschlact of March/April 1918 and the ultimately successful British advance from Amiens in the "last hundred days" of the war relied on bypassing strongpoints and surrounding them later, rather than frontal assaults: as I said above, why couldn't this have been done with Omaha?

But of course, the Americans are not good at learning from previous mistakes, as at Belleau Wood in 1918, let alone certain much more recent examples.
Adrian Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2008, 05:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
Wise1
Getting Wiser!
 
Wise1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 537
You're Top Poster: #6
Wise1 has disabled reputation
I suppose it comes back to my comment regarding the bombing campaign, had it done its job Omaha would not have been as bloody, but in effect the entire bombing left everything intact, by which time it was too late to turn them back or change the plan.

The very fact they managed to take it was an incredible feat given the circumstances.
__________________
Lee Wisener
Site Administrator
-----------------
Wise1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2008, 07:09 PM   #14 (permalink)
Kitty
Kneel before Mod
 
Kitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,295
You're Top Poster: #4
Kitty is on a distinguished road
A good book on the bombing campaign for D Day is D-Day Bombers. Seems a hell of a lot went wrong.
__________________
"Time is a great storyteller"



If my calculations are correct SLINKY + ESCALATOR = EVERLASTING FUN


God is the experience of looking at a tree and saying, "Ah!"
- Joseph Campbell
Kitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0