Go Back   WW2 Forum > General Forums > General Topics
Portal Forums Watch Videos WW2 Radio Register Arcade Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

General Topics Cant find anywhere else? Put it in here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-11-2007, 10:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
Kyt
Άρης
 
Kyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Terra something or other
Posts: 5,650
You're Top Poster: #1
Kyt is on a distinguished road
Awards Showcase
MiD One Year Service 5000 Posts 4000 posts 3000 posts 2000 posts 1500 Posts 1000 Posts 500 Posts 
Total Awards: 8
Question Principals of good design....bombers

A simple question. What principals made for a good bomber aircraft during WW2?

Why were some aircraft outstanding and others mediocre or just plain usless? Leave aside tactics and crew proficiency - let's concentrate on the machine.

For every ying there has to be a yang - heavy bombloads affected range, more defensive weapons affected speed etc.

If you had to design your own bomber aircraft what would you consider the most important features? Designs must within acceptable limits of what was available during the war, and certain considerations must be taken into account. For example, designing a six or eight engine to allow for greater speed, range, bombload etc will limit an aircraft to fewer airfields that have runways long enough to accomodate them, etc
__________________

click me
Kyt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2007, 01:15 AM   #2 (permalink)
Adrian Roberts
Senior Member
 
Adrian Roberts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Wickham, Kent
Posts: 487
You're Top Poster: #10
Adrian Roberts is on a distinguished road
If using during the day, the main requirement was that it had to be jolly fast, i.e the Mosquito. If it was slower than enemy fighters it was dead meat; the Americans tried to overcome this by massive defensive armament which meant that in the case of light bombers such as the B25 &, B26,they had six or seven man crews doing what two men in a Mossie did.

At night, so long as the aircraft was reliable, its survivability was largely down to chance. From this point of view it didn't matter whether you were in a Stirling, Halifax or Lancaster (once the Halifax's tendency to spin was sorted out). But the Lanc had the biggest bomb load, which was the whole point of the exercise.
Adrian Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2007, 07:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Kitty
Kneel before Mod
 
Kitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,631
You're Top Poster: #4
Kitty is on a distinguished road
I think the greatest effect design in a light bomber was int he Mossy: wooden frame which made it flexible and light. Powerful engines which gave it speed, a design that made it manouvreable, and just overall a classic understanding of what a fighting aircraft should be.

Ina heavy bomber then again its good reliable powerful engines such as the Merlin, then a strong yet flexible air frame. In the medium Wellington the geodetic frame gave it everything it need and more besides. A heavy had to have speed, carrying capacity and above all manouvrability to get it out of the search light cones or evade a fighter attack. For me the Lanc did this perfectly with the ability to corkscrew and dive and pull up, almost as well as a fighter.
__________________
"Time is a great storyteller"


If my calculations are correct SLINKY + ESCALATOR = EVERLASTING FUN

God is the experience of looking at a tree and saying, "Ah!"
- Joseph Campbell
Heaven doesn't want me, and Hell is too scared I'll take over.
Kitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0