View Single Post
Old 26-11-2007, 03:51 AM   #9 (permalink)
morse1001
Super Moderator
 
morse1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wishaw, Lanarkshire
Posts: 1,106
You're Top Poster: #5
morse1001 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyt View Post
I've been thinking about this for a few days and was starting to consider the differences between Sealion and Overlord. And then I find that someone else has done the work already!

Military History Online

and this site summarises the problems that a possible invasion would have encountered:

Problems with German Plans for Operation Sealion
I think the major differerance was the fact the Overlord was planned over a number of years and therefore they had time to build the equipment that they needed and Sealion which was produced in a few short months and they had to adapt existing unsuitable equipment for the invasion.

But, lets not forget, an important point was Hitler's determination to carryout the plan in the first place. Both Gehlen and Rudel both had their doubts about Hitler wanting it done and suggested that it was a stretegic deception to cover for the build up on the eastern front
__________________
WWW.Warfaretoday.com

HSL130 picking up the crew of a downed Halifax



Et tantis pretis constitutis plures Macropodidas in hae caupona minime videbis

Last edited by morse1001; 26-11-2007 at 04:02 AM.
morse1001 is offline   Reply With Quote