WW2 Forum - View Single Post

Antipodean Andy · 12-10-2007, 01:08 AM

In late this morning (0730) rather than my usual 0600 but, given Kyt's impatience, I wouldn't have answered anyway! LOL. Nah, had a quick look around and couldn't find anything.

Interesting that even though the first design was not approved, a second one was not put forward. Kyt, have you let the FAA Archive know or doyou think they've omitted the design deliberately?

I'm amazed a sqn with the credentials of 818 went without a "proper" crest.

12-10-2007, 01:08 AM	#8 (permalink)
Antipodean Andy Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Outer reaches, Melbourne, Victoria Posts: 4,040 You're Top Poster: #2 Awards Showcase Total Awards: 7	In late this morning (0730) rather than my usual 0600 but, given Kyt's impatience, I wouldn't have answered anyway! LOL. Nah, had a quick look around and couldn't find anything. Interesting that even though the first design was not approved, a second one was not put forward. Kyt, have you let the FAA Archive know or doyou think they've omitted the design deliberately? I'm amazed a sqn with the credentials of 818 went without a "proper" crest. __________________ http://www.454-459squadrons.org.au/. http://www.awm.gov.au/index.asp Aircraft from No. 60 Squadron levelling out for the "run in" to make a mast-head attack on a Japanese coaster off Akyab. Courtesy AWM.